REVIEW: STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING

Nugroho Nugroho ( Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia )

Abstrak

Salah satu faktor keberhasilan blended learning adalah keterlibatan siswa. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan teknologi untuk mempengaruhi keterlibatan siswa dan efektivitas pengalaman belajar layak untuk diselidiki. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui seperti apa tipe keterlibatan siswa dalam model blended learning. Keterlibatan siswa mencakup tiga aspek, yaitu aspek perilaku, kognitif, dan emosional. Ada banyak aplikasi yang digunakan untuk melakukan blended learning; schoology, classe, quipper, dan lain-lain. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode tinjauan pustaka. Data dikumpulkan dari basis data Scopus. Penyaringan data dengan kriteria penyelidikan dan inklusi. Temuannya; Dalam berbagai penyelidikan tentang partisipasi perilaku, emosional, dan kognitif, tidak semua data menunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran campuran meningkat. Publikasi lain mungkin tidak mengidentifikasi kategori keterlibatan tertentu, namun bukti menunjukkan peningkatan keterlibatan dalam pembelajaran campuran. Satu artikel menemukan keterlibatan perilaku, kognitif, dan afektif. Studi ini juga menunjukkan peningkatan partisipasi siswa dalam pembelajaran campuran. Penelitian ini dapat dilanjutkan dengan memperluas database dan rentang waktu.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Adams, D., Joo, M. T. H., Sumintono, B., & Pei, O. S. (2020). Blended learning engagement in higher education institutions: A differential item functioning analysis of students’ backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6

Adiguzel, T., Kamit, T., & Ertas, B. (2020). Teaching and learning experiences with enhanced books in engineering math and science courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.660725

Alrushiedat, N., & Olfman, L. (2013). Aiding participation and engagement in a blended learning environment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(2), 133–145.

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2

Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). Lms-enabled blended learning use intentions among distance education tutors: Examining the mediation role of attitude based on technology-related stimulus-response theoretical framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8317

Bilen, K. (2015). Effect of Micro Teaching Technique on Teacher Candidates’ Beliefs regarding Mathematics Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.590

Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing student engagement rates. ERIC Digest, 1–7.

Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers and Education, 68, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028

Etom, R., Pabatang, J., Dapanas, K. M. M., Consolacion, R., Iniego, J. M., Jumao-As, A. M., Pabua, A. M., & Tee, K. C. (2021). The use of elearning tools in blended learning approach on students’ engagement and performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012075

Faizah, U., Ambarwati, R., & Rahayu, D. A. (2021). From offline to online learning: Various efforts to secure the learning process during covid-19 outbreaks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012002

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, Context, And adjustment: Addressing definitional, Measurement, And methodological issues. In Learning and Instruction (Vol. 43, pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020a). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—— the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 27(December), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272

Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020b). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—— the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 27(September), 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272

He, W., & Zhao, L. (2020). Exploring undergraduates’ learning engagement via BYOD in the blended learning classroom (EULEBYODBLC). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1356

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3

Huang, M., Kuang, F., & Ling, Y. (2022). EFL learners’ engagement in different activities of blended learning environment. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00136-7

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Kuhn, S. (2018). Digital learning and teaching in medical education: Already there or still at the beginning? In Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (Vol. 61, Issue 2, pp. 201–209). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2673-z

Lane, S., Hoang, J. G., Leighton, J. P., & Rissanen, A. (2021). Engagement and Satisfaction: Mixed-Method Analysis of Blended Learning in the Sciences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00139-5

Machumu, H., & Zhu, C. (2019). Students’ conceptions of learning approaches and their engagement in blended learning environments. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.100490

Mannathoko, M. C. (2013). Does Teaching Practice Effectively Prepare Student-Teachers to Teach Creative and Performing Arts? The Case of Botswana. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p115

Marzali, A.-. (2016). Menulis Kajian Literatur. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 1(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v1i2.1613

Osorio Gómez, L. A., & Duart, J. M. (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01175.x

Pye, G., Holt, D., & Salzman, S. (2018). Investigating different patterns of student engagement with blended learning environments in Australian business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1578

Pyo, J., & Lee, C. H. (2022). Academic Engagement and Task Completion in L2 Listening through Mobile-Assisted Blended Learning (MABL) in Higher Education. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 22(December), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.22..202212.1389

Quevedo, A. (2011). Blended-learning Implementation in Undergraduate Teacher’s Formation Courses: Difficulties from the Students’ Point of View. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society; Champaign, 7(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v07i02/56192

Rahayu, T., Syafril, S., Wekke, I. S., & Erlinda, R. (2019). Teknik Menulis Review Literatur Dalam Sebuah Artikel Ilmiah. INA-Rxiv Papers, 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/z6m2y

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). The Researcher, the Topic, and the Literature: A Procedure for Systematizing Literature Searches. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 03(01), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391273004

Saad, E. H., Al Fattah, M. A. A. A., Fakhry, A. M., & Pessa, M. A. (2021). Comparing undergraduate nursing student academic engagement and achievement in traditional versus blended learning models. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 15(2), 478–482. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs211571969

Sanjeev, R., & Natrajan, N. S. (2019). Role of blended learning environment towards student performance in higher education: Mediating effect of student engagement. International Journal of Learning and Change, 11(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2019.101678

Shohel, M. M., Cann, R., & Atherton, S. (2020). Enhancing student engagement using a blended learning approach: Case studies of first-year undergraduate students. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(4), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020100104

Sukirman, S., Masduki, Y., Suyono, S., Hidayati, D., Kistoro, H. C. A., & Ru’iya, S. (2022). Effectiveness of blended learning in the new normal era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22017

Sulistyanto, H. (2023). The Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning-Based Adaptive Media to Empower Student’s Critical Thinking Skills: Is It Really for VARK Learning Style? Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21219

Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. Ra. (2017). Teaching in Blended learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. In E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice, Second Edition (2nd ed.). AU PRESS. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761

Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: what are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon, 27(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2018-0027


Keywords  :  
Kata Kunci: keterlibatan, tinjauan naratif, perilaku, kognitif, afektif engagement, narrative review, behavioral, cognitive, affective
Galleys  :  
Diterbitkan  :  
2025-06-03
Cara Mengutip  :  
Nugroho, N. (2025). REVIEW: STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v10i1.2285
Terbitan  :