REVIEW: STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING
Abstract
One of the success factors in blended learning is student involvement. As a result, the use of technology to influence student engagement and the efficacy of learning experiences is worth investigating. This research aims to find out what type of student involvement is in the blended learning model. Student involvement includes three aspects, namely behavioral, cognitive, and emotional aspects. There are many learning management systems used to carry out blended learning, including schoology, canvas, quipper, and others. This research uses a literature review method. Data was collected from the Scopus database. Data filtering with inquest and inclusion criteria. The findings; In various investigations on behavioral, emotional, and cognitive participation, not all of the data indicated that student involvement in blended learning increased. Other publications may not identify certain categories of engagement, yet evidence indicates improved engagement in blended learning. One article discovered behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. This study also demonstrates improved student participation in blended learning. This research can be continued by expanding the database and period.
Downloads
References
Adams, D., Joo, M. T. H., Sumintono, B., & Pei, O. S. (2020). Blended learning engagement in higher education institutions: A differential item functioning analysis of students’ backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6
Adiguzel, T., Kamit, T., & Ertas, B. (2020). Teaching and learning experiences with enhanced books in engineering math and science courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.660725
Alrushiedat, N., & Olfman, L. (2013). Aiding participation and engagement in a blended learning environment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(2), 133–145.
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). Lms-enabled blended learning use intentions among distance education tutors: Examining the mediation role of attitude based on technology-related stimulus-response theoretical framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8317
Bilen, K. (2015). Effect of Micro Teaching Technique on Teacher Candidates’ Beliefs regarding Mathematics Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.590
Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing student engagement rates. ERIC Digest, 1–7.
Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers and Education, 68, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028
Etom, R., Pabatang, J., Dapanas, K. M. M., Consolacion, R., Iniego, J. M., Jumao-As, A. M., Pabua, A. M., & Tee, K. C. (2021). The use of elearning tools in blended learning approach on students’ engagement and performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012075
Faizah, U., Ambarwati, R., & Rahayu, D. A. (2021). From offline to online learning: Various efforts to secure the learning process during covid-19 outbreaks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012002
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, Context, And adjustment: Addressing definitional, Measurement, And methodological issues. In Learning and Instruction (Vol. 43, pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020a). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—— the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 27(December), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272
Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020b). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—— the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 27(September), 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272
He, W., & Zhao, L. (2020). Exploring undergraduates’ learning engagement via BYOD in the blended learning classroom (EULEBYODBLC). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1356
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Huang, M., Kuang, F., & Ling, Y. (2022). EFL learners’ engagement in different activities of blended learning environment. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00136-7
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
Kuhn, S. (2018). Digital learning and teaching in medical education: Already there or still at the beginning? In Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (Vol. 61, Issue 2, pp. 201–209). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2673-z
Lane, S., Hoang, J. G., Leighton, J. P., & Rissanen, A. (2021). Engagement and Satisfaction: Mixed-Method Analysis of Blended Learning in the Sciences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00139-5
Machumu, H., & Zhu, C. (2019). Students’ conceptions of learning approaches and their engagement in blended learning environments. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.100490
Mannathoko, M. C. (2013). Does Teaching Practice Effectively Prepare Student-Teachers to Teach Creative and Performing Arts? The Case of Botswana. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p115
Marzali, A.-. (2016). Menulis Kajian Literatur. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 1(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v1i2.1613
Osorio Gómez, L. A., & Duart, J. M. (2012). A hybrid approach to university subject learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01175.x
Pye, G., Holt, D., & Salzman, S. (2018). Investigating different patterns of student engagement with blended learning environments in Australian business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1578
Pyo, J., & Lee, C. H. (2022). Academic Engagement and Task Completion in L2 Listening through Mobile-Assisted Blended Learning (MABL) in Higher Education. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 22(December), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.22..202212.1389
Quevedo, A. (2011). Blended-learning Implementation in Undergraduate Teacher’s Formation Courses: Difficulties from the Students’ Point of View. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society; Champaign, 7(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v07i02/56192
Rahayu, T., Syafril, S., Wekke, I. S., & Erlinda, R. (2019). Teknik Menulis Review Literatur Dalam Sebuah Artikel Ilmiah. INA-Rxiv Papers, 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/z6m2y
Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). The Researcher, the Topic, and the Literature: A Procedure for Systematizing Literature Searches. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 03(01), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391273004
Saad, E. H., Al Fattah, M. A. A. A., Fakhry, A. M., & Pessa, M. A. (2021). Comparing undergraduate nursing student academic engagement and achievement in traditional versus blended learning models. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 15(2), 478–482. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs211571969
Sanjeev, R., & Natrajan, N. S. (2019). Role of blended learning environment towards student performance in higher education: Mediating effect of student engagement. International Journal of Learning and Change, 11(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2019.101678
Shohel, M. M., Cann, R., & Atherton, S. (2020). Enhancing student engagement using a blended learning approach: Case studies of first-year undergraduate students. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(4), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020100104
Sukirman, S., Masduki, Y., Suyono, S., Hidayati, D., Kistoro, H. C. A., & Ru’iya, S. (2022). Effectiveness of blended learning in the new normal era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22017
Sulistyanto, H. (2023). The Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning-Based Adaptive Media to Empower Student’s Critical Thinking Skills: Is It Really for VARK Learning Style? Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21219
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. Ra. (2017). Teaching in Blended learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry. In E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice, Second Edition (2nd ed.). AU PRESS. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761
Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: what are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon, 27(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2018-0027
| Keywords | : |
Keywords:
keterlibatan, tinjauan naratif, perilaku, kognitif, afektif engagement, narrative review, behavioral, cognitive, affective
|
| Galleys | : | |
| Published | : |
2025-06-03
|
| How to Cite | : |
Nugroho, N. (2025). REVIEW: STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v10i1.2285
|
| Issue | : |
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_SCCC.png)
