EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN SEKOLAH PENGGERAK DI SMA DENGAN MODEL EVALUASI CIPP
Abstrak
Evaluation of learning is important to determine the success, growth, and progress of students after completing the learning process within a certain period of time. Curriculum evaluation is also as important as learning evaluation, namely the driving school curriculum. This study aims to describe how the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation paradigm is used to evaluate the driving school curriculum. Case study research is the format used for qualitative research. School supervisors, curriculum representatives, and principals acted as research participants. The selection of study participants was carried out by purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics are used in data analysis and data collection using observation sheets. Research findings using context, input, process, and product (CIPP) indicate that the application of the driving school curriculum is in accordance with learning objectives to improve quality learning outcomes, competency quality of school principals, teacher quality, acceleration of school digitalization, and Pancasila student profiles.
Unduhan
Referensi
Aziz, A. N., Prastya, D. E., Jubba, H., & Wahyuni, H. (2021). Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama di Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah 001 Sebatik Barat. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i3.409
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Djuanda, I. (2020). Implementasi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process Dan Output). Al Amin: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Budaya Islam, 3(1), 37–53.
Fatzuarni, M. (2022). Pentingnya Evaluasi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. 1–10.
Maba, W. (2017). Teacher’s perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26
Muji, A. P., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., & Falma, F. O. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of the sekolah penggerak curriculum using the context, input, process and product evaluation model in high schools. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.29210/020211231
Nurhasanah, Sukmawati, & Sukri, M. (2022). EVALUASI PROGRAM GURU PENGGERAK DI SMA KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA. XI, 1308–1320. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i9.57874
Pembelajaran., T. pengembang M. K. dan. (2011). Kurkulum dan Pembelajaran. In Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Purnomo, Y. H. P., Santoso, T. B., & Santoso, T. B. (2020). Evaluasi Program Seleksi Di Sekolah “XM” Dengan Metode Evaluasi CIPP. JEMAP. https://doi.org/10.24167/jemap.v3i2.2755
RI, P. (2003). Undang-undang (UU) No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional [JDIH BPK RI]. JDIH Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Widoyoko, E. P. (2000). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0084
| Keywords | : |
Kata Kunci:
Evaluasi Program, Sekolah Penggerak, CIPP Program Evaluation, Sekolah Penggerak, CIPP Model
|
| Galleys | : | |
| Diterbitkan | : |
2023-06-02
|
| Cara Mengutip | : |
Rurisman, R., Ambiyar, A., & Aziz, I. (2023). EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN SEKOLAH PENGGERAK DI SMA DENGAN MODEL EVALUASI CIPP. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 8(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v8i1.1064
|
| Terbitan | : |
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_SCCC.png)
