DAMPAK PENGGUNAAN MODEL PROBING PROMPTING LEARNING DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Authors

  • Apdoludin, Subhanadri, Nikita Jofa Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52060/pgsd.v5i2.1058

Keywords:

Process, Results, Probing Prompting Learning

Abstract

The problem in this research is the low process and results of science learning in class IV SDN 60/II Muara Bungo. The aim of the research is to improve the process and results of learning science using the probing prompting learning model. This research is a class action research of two cycles. Each cycle consists of four stages, namely planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. The subjects of this study were Class IV students at SDN 60/II Muara Bungo. The research data was collected through qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques. The research results in cycle I with an average of 83.9% and in cycle II were 91.1% with a very good category. The results of student observations in cycle I with a percentage of 67.7% and cycle II of 85.3%. While classical completeness in cycle I obtained an average value of student learning outcomes of 64.7% increasing to 82.4% in cycle II. It was concluded that the use of the probing prompt learning model could improve the process and results of learning science

References

Apdoludin. (2021a). INOVASI BARU MODEL PEMBELAJARAN (R. Sari (ed.)). CV. Intishar Publishing. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1paJwGaCq-CyyygisoLO3V4Xf2G1nO1pv/view
Apdoludin. (2021b). Pengantar Pendidikan. CV. Intishar Publishing. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8NCwopqGApsNURdEyH93hpOY_m1Jd_9/view
Apdoludin, A., & Putra, R. E. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Koperatif Tipe Jigsaw Meningkatkan Proses Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan, 3(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.52060/pgsd.v3i2.471
Apdoludin, & Martinisyamin. (2022). Modeling Analysis, Findings, Development, Organizing the Material and Learning for Students in Islamic Boarding Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i1.15277
Apdoludin, R. E. P. dan. (2022). Model dan metode pembelajaran. In M. P. Andriyanto, S.S. (Ed.), Semarang (1st ed.). Penerbit Lakeisha. https://www.academia.edu/download/55856965/9230susun_ISI_DAN_DAFTAR_PUSTAKA_BUKU_MODEL_edit_.pdf
Arikunto Suharsimi, dkk. 2019. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Ayati, Sri Barkah. 2017. “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Terhadap Pembelajaran Ipa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sdn Totosari No 102 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017”. Disertasi diterbitkan. Surakarta: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan.
Joyce, Bruce, marsha Weil dan Emily Calhoun (2009). Models Of Teaching. Yoyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Polianus. 2016. “Meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas IV dengan model probing-ptompting di SD Negeri Regunung 01 kecamatan tengarang kabupaten semarang semester II tahun ajaran 2015/2016”. Disertasi diterbitkan. Salatiga: Program Studi Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Rosdiana, Nita. 2010. “Penggunaan Teknik Probing-Prompting pada Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP”. Disertasi diterbitkan. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013 Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZMEDIA.
Sugiyono. 2010. Statistik untuk Pendidikan. Bandung Alfabeta.
Widyastuti, Dyah Ayu. 2014. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 2 Antosari Kecamatan Selemadeg Barat”. Disertasi diterbitkan. Singaraja: Jurusan Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.
Suprijono, A. 2016. Model-Model Pembelajaran Emansipatoris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Published

2023-03-08

How to Cite

Nikita Jofa, A. S. (2023). DAMPAK PENGGUNAAN MODEL PROBING PROMPTING LEARNING DI SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan, 5(2), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.52060/pgsd.v5i2.1058