Membongkar Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Momentum dan Impuls dengan Rasch Model :Temuan dari Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIF-2T)
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa terkait konsep momentum dan impuls, serta menganalisis distribusi kemampuan siswa dan tingkat kesulitan soal menggunakan Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIF-2T) dan Rasch Model. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif, dengan data yang dikumpulkan melalui Google Forms, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Microsoft Excel dan Ministep Rasch Model. Subjek penelitian adalah 19 siswa kelas XI MIPA di salah satu SMA di Kabupaten Sumedang yang dipilih dengan metode random sampling. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa hanya memahami sebagian konsep dalam materi momentum, impuls, dan hukum kekekalan momentum. Pada materi momentum, 51% siswa menunjukkan pemahaman sebagian, sementara pada materi impuls, 62% siswa berada pada kategori yang sama. Materi hukum kekekalan momentum juga menunjukkan 58% siswa memiliki pemahaman yang terbatas. Meskipun demikian, hukum kekekalan momentum memiliki proporsi pemahaman yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan momentum dan impuls, meskipun masih terdapat miskonsepsi yang signifikan. Analisis Rasch Model mengungkapkan bahwa siswa dengan kemampuan tertinggi, L03 (laki-laki), menunjukkan kemampuan yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa lainnya, sementara siswa dengan kemampuan terendah, L04 (laki-laki), menunjukkan keterbatasan dalam menjawab soal-soal. Materi momentum, khususnya soal M1, dinilai sebagai materi dengan tingkat kesulitan tertinggi, sementara soal I9 merupakan soal termudah. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa evaluasi berbasis teknologi, seperti MIF-2T dan Rasch Model, dapat memberikan diagnosis yang lebih akurat terhadap miskonsepsi siswa. Hasil ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih efektif dan dapat diterapkan dalam pendidikan tinggi, khususnya dalam perkuliahan fisika dasar dan teknik
References
Adimayuda, R., Aminudin, A. H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2020). A multitier open-ended momentum and impulse (MOMI) instrument: Developing and assessing quality of conception of 11th grade sundanese students with rasch analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 4799–4804.
Adisna, Q. D. P. P., Wahuni, A., & Suyudi, A. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Fluida Statis. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika Dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 3(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v3i2.4632
Aditya, R. (2024). Pengaruh Guided Discovery Learning Berbantuan Lectora Inspire Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan habits of Mind Siswa SMA.
Aini, H., Kaniawati, I., & Suhendi, E. (2014). Analisis Miskonsepsi Topik Usaha dan Energi Siswa Kelas XI Setelah Pembelajaran Kooperatif Menggunakan Simulasi Komputer ICARE-R View project Physics of Music View project. April. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301523341
Ainiyah, M., Ibrahim, M., & Hidayat, M. T. (2018). The Profile of Student Misconceptions on the Human and Plant Transport Systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012064
Alvarez, P., & Pulgar, A. (1996). The Rasch model. Measuring the impact of scientific journals: analytical chemistry. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 47(6), 458–467.
Amalia, S. A. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Sma Kelas X Pada Materi Momentum Dan Impuls Setelah Pembelajaran Inkuiri Berbatuan Simulasi Komputer. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:127136056
Amiruddin, M. Z. Bin, Samsudin, A., Coştu, B., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., & Apriliyanti, N. (2024). Impressive Analysis of High School Students’ Abilities in Physics Measurement Materials of the New Indonesian-Paradigm Curriculum Via the Rasch Model. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 9(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i2.4808
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Bloom, B. S. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:61966728
Anisa, A. R. (2021). Pengaruh Kurangnya Literasi Serta yang Masih Rendah dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. In Current Research in Education: Conference Series Journal, 1(01), 1–12.
Aristiawan, A. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa SMA Menggunakan Soal Essay. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v2i1.525
Arsyad, Z., Wati, M., & Suyidno, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Module Static Fluid with Authentic Learning to Train Students’ Problem-Solving Skills. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.1017
Aslan, A., & Demircioğlu, G. (2014). The Effect of Video-assisted Conceptual Change Texts on 12th Grade Students’ Alternative Conceptions: The Gas Concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3115–3119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.718
Atchia, S. M. C., & Gunowa, M. (2024). Use of concept cartoons within the conceptual change model to address students’ misconceptions in biology: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2308305
Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
Brandt, S., Moulton, M., & Duckor, B. (2015). Advances in Rasch Modeling : New Applications and Directions Guest Editorial. Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling, 57(3), 338–341. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283394461_Advances_in_Rasch_modeling_New_applications_and_directions_Guest_Editorial
Cahyani, A. A., Pertiwi, F. N., Rokmana, A. W., & Muna, I. A. (2021). Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle 5E Berbasis Literasi Sains terhadap Kemampuan Bertanya Peserta Didik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i2.184
Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2014). A Rasch Model Analysis on Secondary Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 133–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.658
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. H., & Liu, X. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The Research-Based Early Maths Assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701777272
Creswell, J., & Guetterman, T. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition.
Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91–100. https://doi.org/2222-288X
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
Estianinur, Parno, P., Latifah, E., & Ali, M. (2021). Exploration of students’ conceptual understanding in static fluid through experiential learning integrated STEM with formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043129
Fischer, H. E. (2006). Assessing Students ’ Level of Knowledge and Analysing the Reasons for Learning Rasch Analysis. January, 212–246.
Fratiwi, N. J., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Suyana, I., & Samsudin, A. (2017). The transformation of two-tier test into four-tier test on Newton’s laws concepts. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983967
Ghulman, H., & Masodi, M. (2010). Modern measurement paradigm in Engineering Education: Easier to read and better analysis using Rasch-based approach. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490624
Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & DeBoer, G. E. (2011). Using distractor-driven standards-based multiple-choice assessments and Rasch modeling to investigate hierarchies of chemistry misconceptions and detect structural problems with individual items. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90023d
Huda, C., Ma’ani, A. L., & Kaltsum, U. (2022). Analysis of Student Misconceptions Using Digital Four-Tier Diagnostics Test on Newton’s Law. Physics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2022.4.1.8631
Ibnu, M., Indriyani, B., Inayatullah, H., & Guntara, Y. (2019). Aplikasi Rasch Model: Pengembangan Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 2(1), 205–210.
Inggit, S. M., Liliawati, W., & Suryana, I. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebabnya Menggunakan Instrumen Five-Tier Fluid Static Test (5TFST) pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.11016
Irawati, R. K., & Sofianto, E. W. N. (2019). The misconception analysis of natural science students on heat and temperature material using four tier test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032104
Joyce, T. B. Y., & Yates, S. M. (2007). A rasch analysis of the academic self-concept questionnaire. International Education Journal, 8(2), 470–484.
Jubaedah, D. S., Kaniawati, I., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Berformat Four-Tier Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Topik Usaha Dan Energi. VI, SNF2017-RND-35-SNF2017-RND-40. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2017.01.rnd.06
Kaniawati, I., Maulidina, W. N., Novia, H., Samsudin, I. S. A., Aminudin, A. H., & Suhendi, E. (2021). Implementation of Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) Learning Model Assisted by Computer Simulation: Impact of Students’ Conceptual Changes on Force and Vibration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(22), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i22.25465
Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., Muhsin, & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1141
Kumalasari, E. D., & Mahmudi, I. (2024). Analisis Pemodelan Rasch Pada Asesmen Pendidikan (Issue February).
Manurung. (2021). Miskonceptions on The Concept of Photosythesis and Plant Respiration for Class VIII at SMP Negeri 27 Medan In Science Learning. Indonesian Science Education Research (ISER), 3(2), 12–19.
Muthma’innah, M. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Mastery of Mathematical Concepts Material for Linear Equations in Two Variables. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(2), 135–147. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). The effect of STEM-based guided inquiry on light concept understanding and scientific explanation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12499
Nehru, N., Ananda, R., Zb, A., & Navalyyan, D. (2022). Analysis of Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Creativity: Judging from the Process of Deriving the Fermi-Dirac Formula. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.33
Nugraha, F. (2018). Efektivitas Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas IX Pada Materi Kemagnetan. 2, 1–19. https://repository.upi.edu/
Nuri Nurbaniyah. (2013). Efektivitas Metode Index Card Match dalam Meningkatkan Kosakata Bahasa Jepang Siswa SMA.
Osman, S. A., Naam, S. I., Jaafar, O., Badaruzzaman, W. H. W., & Rahmat, R. A. A. O. K. (2012). Application of Rasch Model in Measuring Students’ Performance in Civil Engineering Design II Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 59–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.632
Planinic, M., Ivanjek, L., & Susac, A. (2010). Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010103
Priyasmika, R. (2023). Analysis of Misconceptions on Material Solubility and Solubility Product (Ksp) Using a Four Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(2), 115–126. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Putri. (2016). Analyzing Concepts Mastery and Misconceptions About Evolution of Biology Major Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Putri, C. N., & Hakim, D. L. (2022). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas XII pada Materi Program Linear. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(6), 1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i6.1573-1580
Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. In Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen & Lydiche.
Rashid, R. A., & Abdullah, R. (2008). Application of Rasch-based ESPEGS Model in Measuring Generic Skills of Engineering Students : A New Paradigm. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(8), 591–602.
Rodriguez, M., & Storer, H. (2019). A computational social science perspective on qualitative data exploration: Using topic models for the descriptive analysis of social media data*. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1616350
Rohmah, M., Priyono, S., & Septika Sari, R. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Sma. UTILITY: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 7(01), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.30599/utility.v7i01.2165
Sari, I. P. M., Jatmiko, B., & Suprapto, N. (2023). Students’ Physics Problem-Solving Skills in Daily Life Context: Between Confession and Fact. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2561
Sihombing, R. A. (2023). The Development of Interactive Audio-Visual-Based Media Using VideoScribe to Reduce Misconceptions Electrical Potential and ECG Material. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(2), 69–80.
Sumintono, B. (2017). Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning. October 2017. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. September.
Sutrisno, A. D. (2019). Survey Pemahaman Konsep dan Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Kinematika Gerak. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v4i1.15796
Syukur, H. Z. (2022). Analisi Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika Pada Materi Transformasi Siswa Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Lahusa Tahun Pembelajaran 2020/2021. 2(18), 35–48.
Tesio, L. (2003). Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine : Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970310010448
Tua, F. (2023). Analysis of 7 th -grade Students ’ Misconceptions of Acid-Base. 8(1), 1–7.
Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Nahadi, Samsudin, A., Darman, D. R., Suherli, Z., Hasani, A., Leksono, S. M., Hendrayana, A., Suherman, Hidayat, S., Hamdani, D., & Coştu, B. (2017). Virtual Microscopic Simulation (VMS) to promote students’ conceptual change: A case study of heat transfer. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2)
Keywords | : |
Keywords:
miskonsepsi, momentum, impuls, four tier-test, fisika
|
Galleys | : | |
Published | : |
2025-06-24
|
How to Cite | : |
Devi Yulianty Surya Atmaja, & Achmad Samsudin. (2025). Membongkar Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Momentum dan Impuls dengan Rasch Model :Temuan dari Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIF-2T) . PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL KEGURUAN DAN PENDIDIKAN (SNKP), 3, 194–204. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ummuba.ac.id/index.php/SNKP/article/view/3175
|
Issue | : |