PENGEMBANGAN TES BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI BERBASIS QUIZIZZ PADA ELEMEN DASAR-DASAR TEKNIK MESIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52060/jpvs.v5i1.4852Abstrak
Guru Dasar-Dasar Teknik Mesin di salah satu Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Jakarta masih menyusun soal pada jenjang mengingat, memahami, dan menerapkan, padahal Kurikulum Merdeka menuntut asesmen yang melatih berpikir tingkat tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan prosedur pengembangan, menguji validitas, dan menilai kepraktisan tes kognitif berpikir tingkat tinggi berbasis Quizizz untuk siswa Fase E. Penelitian pengembangan ini memakai desain sekuensial eksploratoris dengan tahap analisis, perancangan, pengembangan, dan implementasi. Dua puluh butir pilihan ganda pada jenjang menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mencipta divalidasi oleh ahli materi, ahli telaah soal, dan ahli bahasa, kemudian diujikan kepada 90 siswa Teknik Pemesinan dan dianalisis dengan model Rasch melalui program QUEST. Koefisien Aiken V validasi materi mencapai 0,847 (tinggi), validasi telaah soal 82,8%, validasi bahasa 100%, dan respons guru 90,9% (sangat praktis). Rerata Infit Mean Square sebesar 1,04 dan reliabilitas estimasi 0,89. Lima belas butir sesuai dengan model, tiga belas butir memiliki daya beda di atas 0,40, dan lima belas butir berada pada tingkat kesukaran sedang. Enam butir tidak berfungsi membedakan siswa, dan lima di antaranya merupakan butir mengevaluasi. Butir mengevaluasi dalam format pilihan ganda perlu ditelaah ulang, terutama pada pengecohnya, sebelum tes dipakai lebih luas
Referensi
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), rm4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Göksün, D. O., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.520
Hamidah, M. H., & Wulandari, S. S. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi “Quizizz”. Efisiensi: Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 18(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i1.36997
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Lede, Y. A., Rahayu, F., & Nadapdap, A. (2019). Developing IRT-based physics critical thinking skill test: A CAT to answer 21st century challenge. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12417a
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (PysTHOTS) peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8
Narassati, N. A., Saleh, R., & Arthur, R. (2021). Pengembangan alat evaluasi berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi Quizizz pada mata pelajaran mekanika teknik dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpts.v3i2.43919
Nisa, S., & Pahlevi, T. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian HOTS berbantuan Quizizz pada mata pelajaran kearsipan SMK. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2146–2159. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.756
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215
Sukatiman, Akhyar, M., Siswandari, & Roemintoyo. (2020). Enhancing higher-order thinking skills in vocational education through scaffolding-problem based learning. Open Engineering, 10(1), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0070
Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The relationship between higher order thinking skills and academic performance of student in mathematics instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
Zhao, F. (2019). Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p37
| Keywords | : |
Kata Kunci:
berpikir tingkat tinggi, instrumen penilaian, model Rasch, Quizizz, teknik mesin
|
| Galleys | : | |
| Diterbitkan | : |
2026-09-29
|
| Terbitan | : |
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi dan Seni
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
