EVALUASI SUMATIF PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF MODEL CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) DI UPTD SD NEGERI 2 PANDAN SARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52060/cr6hwb19Abstract
Summative evaluation of educational programs is an essential instrument to ensure school quality and accountability. This study was conducted at UPTD SD Negeri 2 Pandan Sari with the aim of analyzing the effectiveness of its educational program through the lens of the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product). The research employed a qualitative approach, utilizing interviews, observations, and documentation as data collection techniques. The participants included the principal, teachers, and educational staff. The findings indicate that: (1) in terms of context, the program was designed in alignment with the school’s vision and mission; (2) in terms of input, human resources, facilities, and infrastructure adequately supported program implementation; (3) in terms of process, activities were carried out consistently, although documentation practices require improvement; and (4) in terms of product, the program had a positive impact on students’ literacy development, character formation, social skills, and academic achievement. The study concludes that the CIPP model provides a comprehensive evaluation framework and offers a holistic overview of program effectiveness. These findings serve as a foundation for schools to formulate continuous improvement strategies aimed at enhancing educational quality.
Keywords: Summative Evaluation; CIPP Model; Educational Program; Elementary School.
References
Agnes, P., Br, S. E., Lusi, H., Fahrezy, Y. M. H., Novita, Sarah, S., & Sumiati, S. E. (2025). Kajian tentang pengembangan profesi guru dalam kompetensi pedagogik melalui penambahan pendekatan pada kurikulum merdeka. 6(1), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.52060/jipti.v6i1.2889
Al-Fannani, A. J., Prihantoro, W. K., Achlazein, N., Febriansyah, I., & Muhammad, R. (2026). EVALUASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR DALAM KONTEKS PAI DI SDIT SALSABILA 2 KLASEMAN DENGAN MODEL CIPP. 2(1), 388–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/silabus.v2i1.57343
Citariani, N. M., Sant, I. K. L., & Riawan, I. M. O. (2025). Efektivitas Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Program Pendidikan : Kajian Literatur Sistematis. 16, 108–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v16i2.58457
Diana, R., Hidayat, T., & Lestari, S. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebijakan Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21009/JEP
Firdaus, A. (2025). Model Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan: Definisi, Fungsi, Manfaat, dan Penerapan CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). 3(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52423/rgap.v3i2.16229
Indrawati, E. S., Lelfita, Harti, L., & Asmawati. (2025). PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DALAM MEMBANGUN KEMANDIRIAN SISWA. 10, 301–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jppd.v10i2.31503
Jamilah, J. (2018). PERANAN EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN. Kariman: Jurnal Pendidikan Keislaman, 1, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.52185/kariman.v1i1.6
Kemendikbud. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Nasional.
Krashen. (2004). the power of reading.
Kurniawati, E. W. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Perspektif Model Cipp ( Context , Input , Process , Product ). 2, 19–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v5i3.168
Kusuma, A., Purwanti, A., Nurul, A., Istiyati, S., & Lestari, S. (2025). Peningkatan keterampilan sosial peserta didik melalui model project based learning ( PjBL ) dalam pembelajaran IPAS Kelas V SDIT Nur Hidayah. 155–161. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jpiuns.v11i4.109705
Megawati. (2021). Peningkatan motivasi dan hasil belajar ipa menggunakan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching pada siswa sekolah dasar. 2, 100–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52060/pti.v2i02.630
Muh, A. S., & Muhsam, J. (2022). Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning (pbl) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar ipa siswa kelas iv sekolah dasar. 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52060/pti.v3i01.713
Mulyasa, E. (2020). Menjadi kepala sekolah profesional.
Munandar, A., Alfian, M. R., Echa, A. J., & Zora, K. A. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter. 3, 682–688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56916/innovative.v3i6.6325
Musringudin, Ghani, A. R. A., & Priyono, D. (2022). MODUL PEMBELAJARAN EVALUASI PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN.
Nabila, S. (2025). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Merdeka Menggunakan Model CIPP ( Context , Input , Process , dan Product ). 0738(2), 302–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i2.2336
Nasution, I., Tania, F. N., Tuffahati, J., Siregar, N., Nasution, S. A. E., Rifai, A., & Harahap, M. F. A. (2024). Peran Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Guru dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i2.6802
Nofrianni, E., Prahagia, Y., Juwita Novalia, R., & Tri Susanti, D. (2023). Analisis Kesiapan Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Di Sd. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI), 5(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.52060/jipti.v5i1.1909
Purnomo, A. H., Nasution, D. R., Annisa, R. M., & Syaroh, M. (2022). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling. 4, 2235–2241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i3.5056
Shah, A., Siregar, M. D. A., & Halimah, S. (2025). Evaluasi Kurikulum Merdeka Pelajaran PAI Melalui Model Contex, Input, Process dan Product (CIPP). 5, 371–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55681/silabus.v5i1.57343
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. 31–32.
Sunaryati, T., Ardana, L. N., Vega, N., Kirana, P., & Nurlaela, S. (2024). Analisis Efektivitas Evaluasi Sumatif dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. 8(2021), 35821–35825. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i2.19292
Suryani, R. (2022). Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan mengajar guru melalui kegiatan lesson study di sd negeri bumiharjo. 3, 106–111.
Syamsiar, H., Muzakki, Ratnaya, I. G., & Widiana, I. W. (2023). EVALUASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR BERBASIS CIPP. 6, 536–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v6i2.6802
Uno, H. B. (2019). Profesi Kependidikan: Problema, Solusi, dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia.
Wahjosumidjo. (2018). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah: Tinjauan Teoretik dan Permasalahannya.
Zainuddin, M., & Jaelani, A. (2026). Evaluasi Sumatif Program Pengelolaan Kegiatan Penggantian Antar Waktu (PAW) Anggota DPRD Kabupaten/Kota se-Provinsi NTB: Peran Fasilitasi Biro Pemerintahan dan Otda Setda Provinsi NTB (Periode 2019-2024). (JPAP) Jurnal Praktisi Administrasi Pendidikan, 10, 112–114. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpap.v10i1.1341
| Keywords | : |
Keywords:
Summative Evaluation, CIPP Model, Educational Program, Elementary School
|
| Galleys | : | |
| Published | : |
2026-04-01
|
| Issue | : |
Copyright (c) 2026 Rika Yuliani, Nurul Hidayah, Suhaimi, Sulistiyana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












_SCCC.png)
